Chest Meeting
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
COPYRIGHT © 2004 by the American College of Chest Physicians.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waugh, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Granger, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Waugh, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Granger, W. M.

Tele-Education


Wednesday, October 27, 2004

12:30 PM- 2:00 PM

Stethoscope Transmission Characteristics Using a Pure Tone Sweep versus Pink Noise Input

Jonathan B. Waugh, PhD*, Dale C. Callahan, PhD, George A. Mathew, MS and Wesley M. Granger, PhD

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

PURPOSE: Many factors affect stethoscope sound transmission. Although bench measurements with an artificial pure tone make for a straightforward measurement, chest sounds have many different simultaneous frequencies. We compared stethoscope output using a 50-3000 Hz pure tone sweep and pink noise (50-10K Hz).

METHODS: The sound transmission characteristics of a pure tone sweep and pink noise through a double-tubed diagnostic stethoscope were measured in an anechoic chamber using a computerized signal analysis system (CoolEditTM and MATLAB®). The reference signal was measured at the chest piece and the earpiece (other earpiece occluded). A plot of frequency vs. decibel change is given below.

RESULTS: The plot shows a difference between the shape of the pure tone sweep output and the pink noise output. The sweep output appears to develop periodic additive and subtractive nodes that would create signal distortion.

CONCLUSION: Real use conditions would involve listening to multiple frequencies simultaneously. Using concurrent, multiple frequencies during bench testing appeared to limit confounding variables that are more likely to occur with pure tones.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians using stethoscope comparisons for selection of a stethoscope should pay careful attention to the methodology employed and seek comparisons that use simultaneous multi-frequency analysis (natural or artificial).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 
DISCLOSURE: J.B. Waugh, None.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Chest Physicians.